DCCC537/2024

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：香港特別行政區 訴 T.S.K. - 法院：區域法院 (DC) - 法官：徐綺薇 (暫委法官) - 判決日期：2025年11月13日 ### 案情摘要 被告人 T.S.K. 被控在 2013 年至 2019 年間，在其公屋單位內對其親生女兒 X（當時年約 5 至 11 歲）多次實施猥褻行為。控罪包括三次猥褻侵犯（觸摸胸部、私處及臀部）以及一次煽惑 X 幫其拉褲鍊以獲取性滿足。受害人 X 隨後確診患有創傷後壓力症候群 (PTSD)，出現自殘及自殺念頭，且在家庭缺乏支持的情況下揭發真相。 ### 核心法律爭議 本案的核心 legal issue 在於如何對涉及親屬關係且持續時間較長的兒童性侵案件進行量刑。辯方主張案情相對輕微（無暴力、觸摸時間短）且被告為初犯，請求輕判。控方則強調被告利用父親身份嚴重違反誠信 (breach of trust)，且對受害人造成深遠心理創傷。 ### 判決理由 法官認為，雖然單次行為持續時間短，但犯案期長達 6 年且涉及父女關係，構成嚴重違反誠信。法官引用量刑原則，強調必須達到 deterrence (阻嚇) 及宣示公眾厭惡。法官拒絕接受辯方關於受害人精神問題由母親造成的部分論點，認為被告的行為才是破壞母女關係的元凶。由於被告拒絕認罪且毫無悔意，導致受害人遭受二次傷害，因此不適用減刑。 ### 引用案例與條文 引用 HKSAR v Chan Ching Ho [2000] 及 律政司司長 訴 黃龍威 [2009] 確立量刑原則；引用 HKL [2004] 及 侯其聰 CACC186/2001 強調親屬侵犯兒童應判處即時監禁以保護兒童；參考 吳岳威 [2008] 及 Y.H.M. [2019] 關於觸摸不同身體部位的量刑基準，判定本案嚴重性不低於上述案例。 ### 裁決與命令 被告人四項控罪全部成立。法官裁定總刑期為 38 個月監禁，採取部分分期執行 (concurrent and consecutive sentences) 方式：控罪三 (28個月) 為主，其餘控罪部分刑期與之分期執行，總計 38 個月。 ### 判決啟示 本案強調在涉及親屬性侵兒童的案件中，即使單次觸摸時間短且無暴力，但「持續性」與「違反誠信」是極其沉重的加刑因素。此外，法官明確指出被告拒絕認罪導致受害人出庭回憶痛苦經歷，將被視為加重心理傷害的因素。 --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: HKSAR v T.S.K. - Court: District Court (DC) - Judge: Ivy Tsui (Acting Judge) - Date of Judgment: 13 November 2025 ### Factual Background The defendant, T.S.K., was convicted of four charges involving the indecent assault of his biological daughter, X, between 2013 and 2019 (when X was aged 5 to 11). The acts included touching her breasts, genitals, and buttocks, and inciting her to zip up his trousers for sexual gratification. The victim suffered severe psychological trauma, diagnosed as PTSD, leading to self-harm and suicidal ideation. ### Key Legal Issues The primary legal issue was the determination of an appropriate sentence for a parent committing repeated indecent assaults on a child. The defense argued for leniency based on the short duration of each act, lack of violence, and the defendant's clean record. The prosecution emphasized the severe breach of trust and the profound long-term psychological impact on the victim. ### Ratio Decidendi The judge ruled that the father-daughter relationship and the six-year duration of the abuse constituted a grave breach of trust. Applying sentencing principles of deterrence and public denunciation, the judge found the defendant's refusal to plead guilty and lack of remorse exacerbated the victim's trauma. The judge rejected the defense's claim that the victim's mental health was primarily due to her mother, identifying the defendant's abuse as the root cause. ### Key Precedents & Statutes Cited HKSAR v Chan Ching Ho [2000] and HKSAR v Wong Lung Wai [2009] for general sentencing principles. HKL [2004] and HKSAR v Hou Ki Chung (CACC186/2001) were used to justify immediate imprisonment for familial child abuse. HKSAR v Ng Yue Wai [2008] and HKSAR v Y.H.M. [2019] provided benchmarks for touching different body parts. ### Decision & Orders The defendant was sentenced to a total of 38 months' imprisonment. The sentences for the four charges were ordered to be served partly concurrently and partly consecutively, with the 28-month sentence for Count 3 serving as the primary term. ### Key Takeaways The judgment underscores that in familial child abuse cases, the 'duration of abuse' and 'breach of trust' outweigh the brevity of individual acts. It also highlights that forcing a child victim to testify due to a refusal to plead guilty is viewed as causing secondary emotional harm. --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.