DCCC263/2025

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：香港特別行政區 訴 馮家威 - 法院：區域法院 - 法官：溫紹明 (區域法院暫委法官) - 判決日期：2026年1月28日 ### 案情摘要 被告人於2024年11月20日凌晨駕駛一輛租來的輕型貨車於青衣被截停。警方在車內搜獲共16.1克可卡因及13.75克氯胺酮，並檢取現金及手機。被告人在警誡下承認因經濟壓力而派發毒品以償還債務，每日賺取約4,000至5,000港元。 ### 核心法律爭議 本案涉及對販運危險藥物的量刑決定。核心 legal issue 在於如何根據不同藥物的份量確定量刑起點 (starting point)，以及如何評估被告人在販毒網絡中的角色 (role) 及適用之求情因素 (mitigating factors)。 ### 判決理由 法官遵循 HKSAR v Herry Jane Yusuph 確立的量刑原則：首先參考量刑指引，其次考慮被告角色及罪責，最後扣減求情因素。針對多種藥物，法庭採用綜合處理法 (global approach)，透過「荒謬測試」、「換算測試」及「比例測試」計算出量刑起點。法官認定被告僅為運送者 (courier) 而非策劃者，並考慮其初犯及家庭經濟支柱身份。 ### 引用案例與條文 引用 HKSAR v Herry Jane Yusuph [2021] 1 HKC 458 確立量刑原則；HKSAR v Huang Ruifang (No 3) [2025] 2 HKLRD 138 關於可卡因量刑指引；以及 Secretary for Justice v Hii Siew Cheng [2009] 1 HKLRD 1 關於氯胺酮量刑指引。 ### 裁決與命令 被告人被裁定販運危險藥物罪名成立。法庭以監禁6年為量刑起點，因適時認罪獲得三分之一扣減，最終判處被告人監禁4年。 --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: HKSAR v Fung Ka Wai - Court: District Court - Judge: Wan Siu Ming (Acting District Judge) - Date of Judgment: 28 January 2026 ### Factual Background The defendant was intercepted by police while driving a rented light goods vehicle in Tsing Yi. Police recovered 16.1g of cocaine and 13.75g of ketamine, along with cash and mobile phones. The defendant admitted to distributing drugs to repay debts, earning approximately HKD 4,000 to 5,000 daily. ### Key Legal Issues The primary issue was the determination of the appropriate sentence for trafficking in dangerous drugs. This involved establishing the starting point based on drug quantities and assessing the defendant's role in the trafficking operation and relevant mitigating factors. ### Ratio Decidendi The judge applied the sentencing principles from HKSAR v Herry Jane Yusuph, focusing on sentencing guidelines, the defendant's role, and mitigation. For multiple drug types, a global approach was used, employing 'absurdity', 'conversion', and 'proportionality' tests. The defendant was classified as a courier rather than an organizer, and his status as a first-time offender and family breadwinner was considered. ### Key Precedents & Statutes HKSAR v Herry Jane Yusuph [2021] 1 HKC 458 (sentencing principles); HKSAR v Huang Ruifang (No 3) [2025] 2 HKLRD 138 (cocaine guidelines); and Secretary for Justice v Hii Siew Cheng [2009] 1 HKLRD 1 (ketamine guidelines). ### Decision & Orders The defendant pleaded guilty to trafficking in dangerous drugs. Starting from a baseline of 6 years' imprisonment and applying a one-third reduction for the timely guilty plea, the court sentenced the defendant to 4 years' imprisonment. --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.