判處的監禁刑期是否過重？其他

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：HKSAR v CHEUNG TO MING 張道明 - 法院：高等法院上訴法庭 (Court of Appeal, CA) - 法官：Hon Stock JA - 判決日期：2006年2月10日 ### 案情摘要 申請人張道明（CHEUNG TO MING）因某罪行被判處總共35個月監禁。他對此判決提出上訴，認為刑期過重。本案是申請人就其刑期上訴申請許可的聆訊。法庭審閱了案件的事實和相關照片，以評估判決的合理性。 ### 核心法律爭議 本案的核心法律爭議在於原審法庭對申請人判處的總共35個月監禁刑期是否明顯過重（manifestly excessive）。申請人認為刑期不合理，而上訴法庭需要審查此判決是否符合量刑原則。 ### 判決理由 法官審閱了案件的事實及相關照片後，認為原審法庭判處的35個月監禁刑期，對於認罪的申請人而言，可能存在明顯過重的問題。特別是，法官指出「洗劫一空」（ransacking）的描述可能與照片所示情況不符，暗示實際破壞程度可能被誇大。基於此初步評估，法官決定批准申請人就刑期提出上訴的許可。 ### 引用案例與條文 本案未有特別引用 ### 裁決與命令 法庭批准了申請人就其刑期提出上訴的許可（leave to appeal against sentence）。法庭亦指示應將相關照片納入上訴文件夾中，以供上訴聆訊時審閱。 ### 判決啟示 null --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: HKSAR v CHEUNG TO MING 張道明 - Court: Court of Appeal (CA) - Judge: Hon Stock JA - Date of Judgment: 10 February 2006 ### Factual Background The applicant, Cheung To Ming, was sentenced to a total of 35 months' imprisonment. He sought leave to appeal against this sentence, arguing that it was manifestly excessive. This judgment concerns the application for leave to appeal against sentence. The court reviewed the facts of the case and accompanying photographs to assess the reasonableness of the sentence. ### Key Legal Issues The core legal question in dispute was whether the total sentence of 35 months' imprisonment imposed on the applicant by the trial court was manifestly excessive. The applicant contended the sentence was unreasonable, and the Court of Appeal needed to examine if the sentence adhered to sentencing principles. ### Ratio Decidendi After reviewing the facts and photographs, the judge considered that the 35-month imprisonment sentence for the applicant, who pleaded guilty, might be manifestly excessive. Specifically, the judge noted that the description of "ransacking" might not be fully supported by the photographs, suggesting the actual extent of damage might have been overstated. Based on this preliminary assessment, the judge decided to grant the applicant leave to appeal against sentence. ### Key Precedents & Statutes None prominently cited ### Decision & Orders The court granted the applicant leave to appeal against his sentence. The court also ordered that the relevant photographs should be made part of the appeal bundle for review during the substantive appeal hearing. ### Key Takeaways null --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.