判決理由書文字錯誤的修正？其他

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：香港特別行政區 訴 徐國明 - 法院：高等法院上訴法庭 (Court of Appeal, CA) - 法官：關淑馨法官、彭偉昌法官 - 判決日期：2014年3月21日 ### 案情摘要 本案涉及一宗刑事上訴案件，申請人徐國明（CHUI KWOK MING）就原區域法院刑事案件的判刑提出逾期上訴許可申請。判決理由書於2014年3月27日發出，並於2014年3月28日發布了一份勘誤，修正了判決理由書第26段第3行的一個文字錯誤。 ### 核心法律爭議 本案的核心法律爭議在於申請人提出的判刑逾期上訴許可申請是否應獲批准。判決理由書中提及的勘誤，雖然是關於文字修正，但其本身並非法律爭議點，而是對已發出判決理由書的更正。 ### 判決理由 判決理由書的發布及隨後的勘誤，表明法庭已就申請人的逾期上訴許可申請作出裁決，並在事後對判決理由書中的文字錯誤進行了修正。勘誤本身並未提供案件裁決理由 (ratio decidendi)，而是對已發出判決理由書的補充說明，確保其內容的準確性。 ### 引用案例與條文 本案未有特別引用 ### 裁決與命令 判決理由書於2014年3月27日發出，並於2014年3月28日發布勘誤，修正了判決理由書第26段第3行的一個文字錯誤。具體的判決結果（即逾期上訴許可申請是否獲批）未在此勘誤中直接說明。 --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: HKSAR v Chui Kwok Ming - Court: Court of Appeal (CA) - Judge: Hon Kwan JA, Hon Pang J - Date of Judgment: 21 March 2014 ### Factual Background This case concerns an application for leave to appeal out of time against sentence in a criminal case originating from the District Court. The judgment was delivered on 21 March 2014, with reasons for judgment issued on 27 March 2014. An erratum was subsequently issued on 28 March 2014 to correct a typographical error in paragraph 26, line 3 of the reasons for judgment. ### Key Legal Issues The core legal issue in this case was whether the applicant's application for leave to appeal out of time against sentence should be granted. The erratum mentioned in the reasons for judgment, while a textual correction, is not a legal issue itself but an amendment to the already issued reasons for judgment. ### Ratio Decidendi The issuance of the reasons for judgment and the subsequent erratum indicate that the court had made a decision regarding the applicant's out-of-time appeal application, and later corrected a textual error in the reasons for judgment. The erratum itself does not provide the ratio decidendi (案件裁決理由) of the case but serves as a supplementary clarification to ensure the accuracy of the issued reasons for judgment. ### Key Precedents & Statutes None prominently cited ### Decision & Orders Reasons for judgment were issued on 27 March 2014, followed by an erratum on 28 March 2014 to correct a typographical error in paragraph 26, line 3 of the reasons. The specific outcome of the application for leave to appeal out of time was not directly stated in this erratum. --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.