判決理由書筆誤的更正？申請獲批

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：HKSAR v TRAN VIET THANH; HKSAR v NGUYEN THI PHU; HKSAR v GUAN CUIZHEN (關翠珍) - 法院：高等法院上訴法庭 (Court of Appeal, CA) - 法官：Cheung, Chu JJA 及 Barnes J - 判決日期：2012年1月17日 ### 案情摘要 本案涉及三宗刑事上訴案件，分別為CACC 54/2011、CACC 221/2011及HCMA 360/2011，經法庭合併聆訊。判決書中包含對2012年1月20日發出的判決理由書的更正。更正內容主要涉及兩處，一是關於監禁刑期的計算方式，將「連續執行」更正為「同期執行」；二是關於刑期調整的具體月數，將「18個月」更正為「15個月」。這些更正表明原判決理由書在刑期計算和表述上存在筆誤。 ### 核心法律爭議 本案的核心法律爭議在於判決理由書中關於刑期計算和表述的準確性。上訴法庭需要處理的是，原判決理由書中對監禁刑期（imprisonment sentence）的「連續執行」（consecutively）與「同期執行」（concurrently）的錯誤表述，以及刑期月數的筆誤，並發出更正令以確保判決的清晰和正確性。 ### 判決理由 上訴法庭發出更正令，以糾正其於2012年1月20日發出的判決理由書中的筆誤。更正主要涉及兩點：首先，將原判決理由書中關於監禁刑期「連續執行」的表述更正為「同期執行」，這改變了刑期的實際計算方式。其次，將原判決理由書中提及的第二個刑期月數從「18個月」更正為「15個月」。這些更正確保了判決理由書能準確反映法庭的真實意圖和判決結果。 ### 引用案例與條文 本案未有特別引用 ### 裁決與命令 上訴法庭發出更正令，糾正了2012年1月20日判決理由書中的兩處錯誤。第一處是將監禁刑期「連續執行」的表述更正為「同期執行」。第二處是將刑期月數從「18個月」更正為「15個月」。 ### 判決啟示 null --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: HKSAR v TRAN VIET THANH; HKSAR v NGUYEN THI PHU; HKSAR v GUAN CUIZHEN (關翠珍) - Court: Court of Appeal (CA) - Judge: Cheung, Chu JJA and Barnes J - Date of Judgment: 17 January 2012 ### Factual Background This case involves three criminal appeals, CACC 54/2011, CACC 221/2011, and HCMA 360/2011, which were heard together. The judgment includes corrigenda to the Reasons for Judgment dated 20 January 2012. The corrections primarily concern two points: first, amending the calculation method of imprisonment sentences from "consecutively" to "concurrently"; and second, correcting the specific number of months for a sentence from "18 months" to "15 months". These corrigenda indicate clerical errors in the original Reasons for Judgment regarding sentence calculation and wording. ### Key Legal Issues The core legal issue in this case concerns the accuracy of the sentencing calculations and wording in the Reasons for Judgment. The Court of Appeal needed to address the erroneous statements regarding whether imprisonment sentences were to be served "consecutively" or "concurrently," as well as a clerical error in the number of months for a sentence, and to issue corrigenda to ensure clarity and correctness of the judgment. ### Ratio Decidendi The Court of Appeal issued corrigenda to correct clerical errors in its Reasons for Judgment dated 20 January 2012. The corrections primarily involved two points: first, changing the statement regarding imprisonment sentences from "consecutively" to "concurrently," which alters the actual calculation of the sentence. Second, correcting the number of months for a second sentence from "18 months" to "15 months." These corrections ensure that the Reasons for Judgment accurately reflect the court's true intention and the outcome of the judgment. ### Key Precedents & Statutes None prominently cited ### Decision & Orders The Court of Appeal issued corrigenda to correct two errors in the Reasons for Judgment dated 20 January 2012. The first correction changed the statement regarding imprisonment sentences from "consecutively" to "concurrently." The second correction changed the sentence duration from "18 months" to "15 months." ### Key Takeaways null --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.