判決書引用案例錯誤的更正？其他

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：HKSAR v CHEUNG SUET TING - 法院：高等法院上訴法庭 (Court of Appeal, CA) - 法官：Hon Hartmann JA and Mackintosh J - 判決日期：2010年7月9日 ### 案情摘要 本案為一宗刑事上訴案件，涉及對原審判決的更正。具體案情並未在更正文件中詳細說明，但可推斷原審法庭曾引用一宗案例，而該案例的引用方式或內容出現了錯誤，需要透過本更正令予以修正。 ### 核心法律爭議 本更正令的核心法律問題在於，原審判決書中引用案例的準確性。上訴法庭需要審查判決書中引用的案例是否正確，並在發現錯誤時予以更正，以確保判決書的法律依據無誤。 ### 判決理由 上訴法庭發出更正令，指出原審判決書第10頁第24段第15行的引述應為「SJ v Hui Siu Man [1999] 2 HKLRD 236」。這表明法庭在審閱判決書時發現了引用錯誤，並基於確保法律文件準確性的原則，發出了此更正令。 ### 引用案例與條文 本案未有特別引用 ### 裁決與命令 上訴法庭發出更正令，指示原審判決書第10頁第24段第15行的引述應更正為「SJ v Hui Siu Man [1999] 2 HKLRD 236」。 ### 判決啟示 本更正令強調了司法文件中引用案例的準確性至關重要，即使是細微的引用錯誤也需要及時糾正，以維護判決書的權威性和法律的嚴謹性。這對法律從業者在撰寫法律文件時具有警示作用。 --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: HKSAR v CHEUNG SUET TING - Court: Court of Appeal (CA) - Judge: Hon Hartmann JA and Mackintosh J - Date of Judgment: 9 July 2010 ### Factual Background This is a criminal appeal case concerning a corrigendum to a previous judgment. The specific facts of the original case are not detailed in this corrigendum document. However, it can be inferred that the original court had cited a case, and there was an error in the citation or content of that reference, necessitating this corrigendum to rectify it. ### Key Legal Issues The core legal issue in this corrigendum is the accuracy of a case citation within the original judgment. The Court of Appeal needed to review whether the cited case in the judgment was correct and, upon identifying an error, to issue a correction to ensure the legal basis of the judgment was sound. ### Ratio Decidendi The Court of Appeal issued a corrigendum, stating that the quotation in the 15th line of paragraph 24, page 10 of the original judgment should be "SJ v Hui Siu Man [1999] 2 HKLRD 236". This indicates that the court, upon reviewing the judgment, found a citation error and issued this corrigendum based on the principle of ensuring the accuracy of legal documents. ### Key Precedents & Statutes None prominently cited ### Decision & Orders The Court of Appeal issued a corrigendum, ordering that the quotation in the 15th line, paragraph 24, page 10 of the original judgment be corrected to "SJ v Hui Siu Man [1999] 2 HKLRD 236". ### Key Takeaways This corrigendum highlights the critical importance of accuracy in citing cases within judicial documents. Even minor citation errors require prompt correction to uphold the authority of judgments and the rigor of the law. This serves as a reminder for legal practitioners when drafting legal documents. --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.