判決書中損害賠償金額的更正？申請獲批

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：CHAN YUET LUI REBECCA v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD. & OTHERS - 法院：高等法院原訟法庭 (Court of First Instance, CFI) - 法官：Jackson 法官 - 判決日期：2002年1月30日 ### 案情摘要 本案為一項判決更正令 (corrigendum)，旨在修正高等法院原訟法庭於2002年1月7日就CHAN YUET LUI REBECCA訴THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD. & OTHERS一案所作判決中的多處筆誤。這些錯誤主要涉及計算損害賠償金額，包括泌尿科治療費用、醫療諮詢和藥物費用、特別設備費用、庭前特別損害賠償利息，以及總計金額。更正令詳細列出了原判決中需要修改的具體頁碼、行數及金額。 ### 核心法律爭議 本案的核心法律爭議在於原判決中計算損害賠償金額時出現的筆誤，以及如何透過更正令 (corrigendum) 對這些錯誤進行修正。爭議點包括多項賠償金額的具體數字，例如泌尿科治療、醫療諮詢和藥物、特別設備費用，以及總計賠償額和利息的計算錯誤。 ### 判決理由 法官透過發出更正令，對原判決中多處計算錯誤進行了修正。這類更正通常基於法院固有的權力，以確保判決的準確性，糾正明顯的筆誤或計算錯誤，而非重新審理案件的實質內容。更正令詳細列明了每一項需要修改的金額和相關的乘數 (multiplier)，以確保最終判決的賠償總額正確無誤。 ### 引用案例與條文 本案未有特別引用 ### 裁決與命令 法庭發出更正令，修正了原判決中多項損害賠償金額的計算錯誤。具體修改包括泌尿科治療費用、醫療諮詢和藥物費用、特別設備費用、庭前特別損害賠償利息，以及最終的總賠償金額。總賠償金額由原來的$18,597,263.00修正為$19,243,576.00。 ### 判決啟示 null --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: CHAN YUET LUI REBECCA v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD. & OTHERS - Court: Court of First Instance (CFI) - Judge: The Honourable Mr Justice Jackson - Date of Judgment: 30 January 2002 ### Factual Background This case involves a corrigendum issued to correct several errors in the judgment handed down on 7 January 2002 in the case of CHAN YUET LUI REBECCA v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD. & OTHERS. The errors primarily concerned the calculation of damages, including costs for urological treatment, medical consultation and medication, special equipment, pre-trial special damages interest, and the overall total sum. The corrigendum specifies the exact page numbers, lines, and amounts that required amendment in the original judgment. ### Key Legal Issues The core legal issue in this case was the rectification of clerical and computational errors in the original judgment's assessment of damages. The points of contention involved specific figures for various heads of damages, such as urological treatment, medical consultation and medication, special equipment costs, and the overall total compensation and interest calculations. ### Ratio Decidendi The judge issued a corrigendum to rectify multiple computational errors in the original judgment. Such corrections are typically made under the court's inherent power to ensure the accuracy of its judgments, addressing obvious slips or miscalculations rather than re-litigating the substantive merits of the case. The corrigendum meticulously detailed each amount and multiplier that needed adjustment to ensure the final total sum of damages was correct. ### Key Precedents & Statutes None prominently cited ### Decision & Orders The court issued a corrigendum, amending several computational errors in the original judgment's assessment of damages. Specific amendments included the costs for urological treatment, medical consultation and medication, special equipment, pre-trial special damages interest, and the final total compensation. The grand total was amended from $18,597,263.00 to $19,243,576.00. ### Key Takeaways null --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.