人身傷害賠償金額的計算？申索得直

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：FUNG CHUN MAN v HOSPITAL AUTHORITY and SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE for and on behalf of SECRETARY FOR FOOD AND HEALTH - 法院：高等法院原訟法庭 (Court of First Instance, CFI) - 法官：Hon Bharwaney J - 判決日期：2011年11月11日 ### 案情摘要 本案涉及一宗人身傷害訴訟 (Personal Injuries Action)，原告人FUNG CHUN MAN控告醫院管理局 (Hospital Authority) 為第一被告，以及律政司司長 (Secretary for Justice) 代表食物及衞生局局長 (Secretary for Food and Health) 為第二被告。判決日期為2011年11月11日，但隨後於2011年11月28日發布了一份更正通知 (Corrigendum)，指出判決書第74段J行的一個金額數字有誤，應為「$355,800」而非「$345,800」。 ### 核心法律爭議 本案的核心法律爭議是關於人身傷害索賠中損害賠償金額的計算。具體而言，更正通知表明判決書中有一項金額計算錯誤，需要修正。這暗示了原告人可能就其所受傷害尋求賠償，而法院需要確定適當的賠償金額。 ### 判決理由 判決書的更正通知本身並未詳細闡述案件裁決理由 (ratio decidendi)，但其存在表明法院在原判決中已就人身傷害索賠作出裁決，並計算了損害賠償金額。更正通知僅針對判決書中一個數字錯誤進行修正，這項修正本身不改變原判決的法律原則或分析，而是確保判決書的準確性。 ### 引用案例與條文 本案未有特別引用 ### 裁決與命令 判決書的更正通知指示將原判決書第74段J行的金額從「$345,800」更正為「$355,800」。這表明法院已裁定原告人獲得賠償，並對賠償金額作出了最終確定。 ### 判決啟示 null --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: FUNG CHUN MAN v HOSPITAL AUTHORITY and SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE for and on behalf of SECRETARY FOR FOOD AND HEALTH - Court: Court of First Instance (CFI) - Judge: Hon Bharwaney J - Date of Judgment: 11 November 2011 ### Factual Background This case involves a Personal Injuries Action where the plaintiff, FUNG CHUN MAN, sued the Hospital Authority as the 1st Defendant and the Secretary for Justice, on behalf of the Secretary for Food and Health, as the 2nd Defendant. The judgment was dated 11 November 2011. Subsequently, a Corrigendum was issued on 28 November 2011, indicating an error in the judgment at paragraph 74, Line J, where the amount should be "$355,800" instead of "$345,800". ### Key Legal Issues The core legal issue in this case, as indicated by the Corrigendum, pertains to the calculation of damages in a personal injuries claim. Specifically, the correction notice highlights an error in a monetary figure within the judgment, requiring rectification. This implies that the plaintiff sought compensation for injuries sustained, and the court had to determine the appropriate quantum of damages. ### Ratio Decidendi The Corrigendum itself does not elaborate on the ratio decidendi of the judgment. However, its existence indicates that the court had already rendered a decision on the personal injuries claim and calculated the damages. The Corrigendum merely corrects a numerical error in the judgment, which does not alter the underlying legal principles or analysis of the original decision but ensures the accuracy of the judgment document. ### Key Precedents & Statutes None prominently cited ### Decision & Orders The Corrigendum directs that the amount in paragraph 74, Line J of the original judgment dated 11 November 2011, should be corrected from "$345,800" to "$355,800". This indicates that the court had awarded damages to the plaintiff and this order finalized the specific amount. ### Key Takeaways null --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.