判決書筆誤更正？其他

### 案件基本資料 - 案件名稱：A Solicitor v The Law Society of Hong Kong - 法院：高等法院上訴法庭 (Court of Appeal, CA) - 法官：林文瀚副庭長、Barma 及 McWalters 上訴法庭法官 - 判決日期：2015年4月2日 ### 案情摘要 本案涉及兩宗上訴案件，均源於律師紀律審裁組於2014年1月17日作出的命令。第一宗上訴（CACV 20/2014）由一名律師提出，針對紀律審裁組對其作出的紀律處分。第二宗上訴（CACV 78/2014）由香港律師會提出，可能涉及對該律師的處分是否足夠或審裁組的裁決。兩宗上訴合併審理，但判決書本身僅為一份更正啟事，並未提供案件的實質內容或紀律處分的詳情。 ### 核心法律爭議 由於本判決書僅為一份更正啟事，其核心法律爭議並未在文件中闡明。文件僅指出對原判決書中律師代表的姓名和職稱進行了更正。因此，無法從本文件中識別出實質的法律爭議或各方的主要論點。 ### 判決理由 本判決書並未包含任何案件裁決理由 (ratio decidendi)，因為它僅為一份更正啟事，旨在修正先前判決書中的筆誤。更正的內容是關於律師代表的姓名和職稱，將「Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate of Stephenson Harwood」更正為「Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate instructed by Stephenson Harwood」。這不涉及法律原則的應用或解釋。 ### 引用案例與條文 本案未有特別引用 ### 裁決與命令 本判決書的唯一命令是發布一份更正啟事，修正2015年4月2日判決書第37頁末尾關於律師代表姓名和職稱的筆誤。更正內容為將「Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate of Stephenson Harwood」改為「Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate instructed by Stephenson Harwood」。 ### 判決啟示 null --- ### 免責聲明 本摘要由人工智能自動生成，內容可能存在錯誤或遺漏，僅供參考，不構成法律意見。如需法律建議，請諮詢合資格律師。### Case Details - Case Name: A Solicitor v The Law Society of Hong Kong - Court: Court of Appeal (CA) - Judge: Hon Lam VP, Barma and McWalters JJA - Date of Judgment: 2 April 2015 ### Factual Background This case involves two appeals, both stemming from an order made by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal on 17 January 2014. The first appeal (CACV 20/2014) was brought by a solicitor against a disciplinary sanction. The second appeal (CACV 78/2014) was brought by The Law Society of Hong Kong, potentially concerning the adequacy of the sanction or the Tribunal's findings. Both appeals were heard together, but the judgment itself is merely a corrigendum, providing no substantive details of the case or the disciplinary proceedings. ### Key Legal Issues As this judgment is solely a corrigendum, the core legal issues are not articulated within the document. The document only indicates a correction to the name and designation of counsel in the original judgment. Therefore, no substantive legal issues or main arguments from the parties can be identified from this document. ### Ratio Decidendi This judgment contains no ratio decidendi as it is merely a corrigendum issued to correct a clerical error in a previous judgment. The correction pertains to the name and designation of counsel, changing "Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate of Stephenson Harwood" to "Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate instructed by Stephenson Harwood." This does not involve the application or interpretation of legal principles. ### Key Precedents & Statutes None prominently cited ### Decision & Orders The sole order in this judgment is the issuance of a corrigendum to amend a clerical error in the judgment dated 2 April 2015, specifically on page 37, regarding the name and designation of counsel. The correction changes "Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate of Stephenson Harwood" to "Mr Jason Karas, Solicitor Advocate instructed by Stephenson Harwood." ### Key Takeaways null --- ### Disclaimer This summary is AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified lawyer for professional legal advice.