An Ordinance to provide for the application for, and the operation and effect of, remote hearings; to provide for fair disposal of, and public access to, remote hearings; to provide for offences to protect the integrity of proceedings; to provide for offences relating to the prohibition of recording on court premises; and to provide for related matters.
[28 March 2025]
Enacted by the Legislative Council.
This Ordinance may be cited as the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance.
In this Ordinance—
Cap. 221 (《第221章》) means the Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap. 221); court (法院)— (a)means—(i)the Court of Final Appeal;(ii)the Court of Appeal;(iii)the Court of First Instance;(iv)the Competition Tribunal;(v)the District Court;(vi)a Magistrates’ Court (including the Juvenile Court);(vii)the court of committal as defined by section 2(1) of the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance (Cap. 503);(viii)the Lands Tribunal;(ix)the Labour Tribunal;(x)the Small Claims Tribunal;(xi)the Obscene Articles Tribunal; or(xii)the Coroner’s Court; and (b)includes a JJO; excluded proceeding (獲豁除法律程序) means a proceeding set out in Schedule 1; JJO (法官或司法人員)— (a)means a judicial officer as defined by section 2 of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission Ordinance (Cap. 92); and (b)includes—(i)a person who is appointed as a deputy or temporary judicial officer—(A)to perform the duties of a judicial office as defined by that section; or(B)to act otherwise in the office of a judicial office so defined; and(ii)a person who is appointed to a specified Tribunal to perform adjudicating functions; legal representative (法律代表) includes— (a)a legal officer as defined by section 2 of the Legal Officers Ordinance (Cap. 87); (b)a solicitor or a barrister as defined by section 2(1) of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159); and (c)an official prosecutor who is appointed under section 13 of the Magistrates Ordinance (Cap. 227); live audio link (語音直播聯繫), in relation to a proceeding, means facilities that enable real time audio communication among the JJOs and the participants during the proceeding; live audio-visual link (音視直播聯繫), in relation to a proceeding, means facilities that enable real time audio and visual communication among the JJOs and the participants during the proceeding; NS proceeding (國安法律程序) means a proceeding of a case concerning national security (within the meaning of section 3(2) of the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (6 of 2024)); participant (參與者), in relation to a proceeding— (a)means a person who, in that proceeding, is—(i)a party;(ii)an authorized representative of a party;(iii)a legal representative of a party;(iv)a witness (other than a vulnerable witness); or(v)an individual who—(A)is appointed to advise, or is involved in advising, on any matter in relation to the proceeding;(B)is appointed to assist, or is involved in assisting, the JJO presiding at the proceeding;(C)is appointed to assist, or is involved in otherwise facilitating, the conduct of the proceeding; or(D)is entitled to participate in that proceeding under an Ordinance or a practice direction issued by the court; and (b)includes any other person who is allowed by the court to be involved in that proceeding; party (訴訟方), in relation to a proceeding, means— (a)the person who initiates the proceeding; (b)the person against whom the proceeding is initiated; or (c)any other person who is entitled to be heard in the proceeding; physical hearing (實體聆訊) means a proceeding that is not subject to a remote hearing order; proceeding (法律程序) means a proceeding before a court, and includes part of such a proceeding; remote hearing (遙距聆訊) means a proceeding that is subject to a remote hearing order; remote hearing order (遙距聆訊令) means an order made under section 6(1) or (4) and (if applicable) varied under section 7(3) or 8(1); remote medium (遙距媒介) includes— (a)a live audio link; (b)a live audio-visual link; and (c)any other real time communication facility as the Chief Justice may designate by rules made, or in a direction given, under section 32; specified Tribunal (指明審裁處) means— (a)the Competition Tribunal; (b)the Lands Tribunal; (c)the Labour Tribunal; (d)the Small Claims Tribunal; or (e)the Obscene Articles Tribunal; vulnerable witness (易受傷害證人) means a person who— (a)would be permitted under section 79B(2) or (3) of Cap. 221 to give evidence or be examined by way of a live television link; or (b)would be permitted under section 79B(4) or (4A) of Cap. 221 to give evidence by way of a live television link.This Ordinance applies to the Government.
Nothing in this Ordinance affects the operation of—
Part IIIA of Cap. 221; or
section 23 of the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance (Cap. 503).
No NS proceeding may be conducted through a remote medium under this Ordinance, under the law or otherwise.
The court may, on its own motion or on application by any party to a proceeding, make an order for the proceeding to be conducted through a remote medium.
Subsection (1) does not apply to an excluded proceeding.
The court may, in an order under subsection (1), specify—
in relation to the proceeding—
the remote medium to be used for the proceeding;
the date and time for the hearing of the proceeding; and
the place or virtual space, or both, for the hearing of the proceeding;
in relation to the participants of the proceeding—
the participants who are to attend the proceeding through a remote medium (remote participants); and
the place (whether in or outside Hong Kong) from which the remote participants are to attend the proceeding; and
any other conditions that the court considers expedient for the conduct of the proceeding.
The court may, on its own motion or on application by any party to an excluded proceeding, make an order for those parts of the excluded proceeding as specified in subsection (5) to be conducted through a remote medium.
For the purposes of subsection (4), the court may make an order for a witness (other than a vulnerable witness) to the excluded proceeding to give evidence or be examined through a remote medium.
An order may only be made under subsection (1) or (4) if the court, after considering the factors under section 9, is satisfied that, in the circumstances of the case, it is in the interests of justice to make the order.
The court may, before making a remote hearing order for a proceeding under section 6, invite the parties to the proceeding to make submissions.
If the court does not invite the parties to make submissions under subsection (1) before making a remote hearing order, any party to the proceeding who is dissatisfied with the order may apply to the court within a period as specified by the court to vary or revoke the order.
After hearing an application under subsection (2), the court may affirm, vary or revoke the order, and may impose any condition that the court considers appropriate.
The court must inform the parties to the proceeding of a decision under subsection (3).
The court may, on its own motion or on application by any party to a proceeding, vary or revoke a remote hearing order for the proceeding, and may impose any condition that the court considers appropriate.
An order may only be varied or revoked under subsection (1) if the court, after considering the factors under section 9, is satisfied that, in the circumstances of the case, it is in the interests of justice to vary or revoke the order.
The court must inform the parties to the proceeding of a decision under subsection (1).
This section applies if there has been a material change of circumstances since—
the making of a remote hearing order under section 6 and (if applicable) the variation of the order under section 7; or
the variation of a remote hearing order under this section.
In deciding whether to make, affirm, vary or revoke a remote hearing order for a proceeding under section 6, 7 or 8, the court must consider the following factors (if applicable)—
the nature, complexity and urgency of the proceeding;
the nature of the evidence intended to be adduced;
the views of the parties;
the ability of the parties to engage with and follow the proceeding (if conducted through a remote medium);
the personal or special circumstances of the parties, including any physical, visual or auditory impairment, cognitive difference and mental or psychological health issue;
the maintenance of the rights of the parties;
whether the parties are legally represented;
whether the privileged communication between the parties and their respective legal representatives may be affected;
whether the parties and the parties’ legal representatives can conduct their case effectively;
the measures to be taken to ensure that evidence is given freely without coercion or other influence;
the potential impact of the order on the assessment of the credibility of witnesses and the reliability of the evidence presented;
whether the use of the remote medium is likely to promote fair and efficient disposal of the proceeding;
whether the right to a fair trial can be effectively maintained;
the quality and security of the remote hearing facilities and their availability to the parties;
whether there is any public order, security, public health or emergency concern that makes it undesirable or impracticable for the parties to attend the proceeding in person;
any other relevant considerations.
Where a JJO conducts a remote hearing under this Ordinance, the JJO is deemed, for all intents and purposes, to have satisfied the requirement under any law to be physically present at the proceeding.
A JJO may conduct a remote hearing in—
a court premises specified in Schedule 2; or
any other place as directed by the Chief Justice.
A JJO conducting a remote hearing under this Ordinance has all the powers that the JJO would have if the remote hearing were a physical hearing, and the participants attended the proceeding in person.
Unless otherwise required by law, or an order or direction of the court, a participant may attend a remote hearing at a place within or outside Hong Kong.
A participant who fails to attend a remote hearing on the date and time, and at the place or virtual space, in compliance with a remote hearing order is subject to the same consequences as if the remote hearing were a physical hearing.
A participant who attends a remote hearing through a remote medium in compliance with a remote hearing order is deemed, for all intents and purposes, to have satisfied the requirement under any law, or an order or direction of the court, to be physically present at the proceeding.
The law in force in Hong Kong relating to evidence, procedure, contempt of court and perjury applies to a participant who attends a remote hearing in compliance with a remote hearing order at a place outside Hong Kong.
An oath to be sworn or an affirmation to be made by a participant in a remote hearing may be administered—
by way of a live audio-visual link, as nearly as practicable in the same way as oaths or affirmations are physically administered in a court; or
by a person authorized by the court, acting at the direction of and on behalf of the court, at the place where the participant is to attend the proceeding.
In this Division—
document (文件) means anything in and on which information of any description is recorded; object (物品) means anything other than a document, which may be in tangible or intangible form; send (送交), in relation to a document, includes file, lodge, produce, give, notify, serve, deliver, submit, furnish and any other expression that signifies or suggests conveying the document.A document in relation to a remote hearing may be transmitted electronically as directed by the court.
Where a document is transmitted in compliance with a direction under subsection (1), the transmission is deemed, for all intents and purposes, to have satisfied the requirement under any law to send such a document for the purposes of a physical hearing.
An object in relation to a remote hearing may be presented electronically as directed by the court.
If a participant to a remote hearing is required to sign or write on a document under any law, or an order or direction of the court, the court may, for the purposes of the requirement, request that the participant sign or write on the document in a way as directed by the court.
Where a document is signed or written on in compliance with a request under subsection (1), the signature or writing is deemed, for all intents and purposes, to have satisfied the requirement to sign or write on the document for the purposes of a physical hearing.
In this section—
write (填寫), in relation to a document, includes draw, shade, colour, circle, cross out, underline, highlight, annotate and any other expression that signifies or suggests marking on the document.In this Part—
open proceeding (公開法律程序) means a remote hearing that is not to be held in private.The court must, in relation to an open proceeding, give direction to allow access to the proceeding by the public unless the court, for any of the reasons stated in Article 10 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights set out in Part II of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap. 383), otherwise directs.
The court may direct an open proceeding to be broadcast.
A broadcast of an open proceeding must be accessible by the public—
in a place, and in a manner, as specified by the Judiciary Administrator; or
through such other means as the court considers appropriate.
In this Part—
image (影像) means— (a)a portrait, drawing or sketch; (b)a photograph, video recording or film; or (c)a static or moving visual record; publish (發布) includes send, transmit, distribute, circulate, upload, reproduce, make available and disseminate; record (記錄)— (a)means—(i)any act of creating or generating an image; or(ii)any act of creating or generating an audio record; and (b)includes any act of making an audio record, a visual record or an audio-visual record, that is transmitted in real time with or without retention or storage in—(i)a physical form; or(ii)an electronic form from which the record is capable of being reproduced with or without the aid of any device.A person commits an offence if the person, without permission of the court, intentionally records either or both of the following—
a protected session of a proceeding;
a protected subject in relation to a proceeding.
A person commits an offence if—
the person, without permission of the court, intentionally publishes an unauthorized proceeding recording or a reproduction of an unauthorized proceeding recording; and
the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the recording concerned is an unauthorized proceeding recording.
A person commits an offence if—
the person, without permission of the court, intentionally publishes an authorized proceeding recording or a reproduction of an authorized proceeding recording; and
the person knows that the person has no permission of the court to publish the recording or reproduction (as the case may be), or is reckless as to whether the person has the permission of the court to publish the recording or reproduction (as the case may be).
A person who commits an offence under this section is liable—
on summary conviction—to a fine at level 5 and to imprisonment for 2 years; or
on conviction on indictment—to a fine at level 6 and to imprisonment for 5 years.
In this section—
authorized proceeding recording (獲授權法律程序紀錄) means a proceeding recording made with permission of the court; courtroom (法庭) means a place in a court premises specified in Schedule 2 where a proceeding is being conducted, regardless of the mode of hearing for the proceeding; proceeding recording (法律程序紀錄) means a recording of either or both of the following— (a)a protected session of a proceeding; (b)a protected subject in relation to a proceeding; protected session (受保護時段)— (a)in relation to a proceeding that is conducted through a remote medium specified for the proceeding, means the proceeding and includes the following periods on each day of the proceeding—(i)the period before the start of the proceeding when any of the specified persons is already connected to the remote medium;(ii)any breaks during the proceeding as ordered by the court; and(iii)the period after the end of the proceeding when any of the specified persons is still connected to the remote medium; and (b)in relation to a proceeding that is conducted in a courtroom, means the proceeding and includes the following periods on each day of the proceeding—(i)the period before the start of the proceeding when any of the specified persons is present in the courtroom;(ii)any breaks during the proceeding as ordered by the court; and(iii)the period after the end of the proceeding when any of the specified persons is still present in the courtroom; protected subject (保護對象), in relation to a proceeding, means— (a)the courtroom in which the proceeding is conducted; or (b)any person appearing in the courtroom; specified person (指明人士), in relation to a proceeding, means a JJO, a juror or a participant in respect of that proceeding; unauthorized proceeding recording (未經授權法律程序紀錄) means a proceeding recording made without permission of the court.A person commits an offence if the person, without permission of the court, intentionally records a broadcast under section 24 or a broadcast of a physical hearing.
A person commits an offence if—
the person, without permission of the court, intentionally publishes an unauthorized broadcast recording or a reproduction of an unauthorized broadcast recording; and
the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the recording concerned is an unauthorized broadcast recording.
A person commits an offence if—
the person, without permission of the court, intentionally publishes an authorized broadcast recording or a reproduction of an authorized broadcast recording; and
the person knows that the person has no permission of the court to publish the recording or reproduction (as the case may be), or is reckless as to whether the person has the permission of the court to publish the recording or reproduction (as the case may be).
A person who commits an offence under this section is liable—
on summary conviction—to a fine at level 5 and to imprisonment for 2 years; or
on conviction on indictment—to a fine at level 6 and to imprisonment for 5 years.
In this section—
authorized broadcast recording (獲授權廣播紀錄) means a broadcast recording made with permission of the court; broadcast recording (廣播紀錄) means a recording of— (a)a broadcast under section 24; or (b)a broadcast of a physical hearing; unauthorized broadcast recording (未經授權廣播紀錄) means a broadcast recording made without permission of the court.In a proceeding brought under section 26 or 27, a certificate stating that a specified permission is not given by the court to a person, and purporting to be signed by or on behalf of the Judiciary Administrator, is admissible in evidence on its production without further proof.
Unless the contrary is proved, a certificate admitted in evidence under subsection (1)—
is presumed to be signed by or on behalf of the Judiciary Administrator (as the case may be); and
is evidence of the facts stated in the certificate.
In this section—
specified permission (指明批准) means a permission to do an act that would otherwise constitute an offence under section 26 or 27.It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under section 26 or 27 to establish that, at the time of the alleged offence, the person had reasonable excuse for the contravention.
A person is taken to have established the reasonable excuse for the contravention if—
there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue with respect to the reasonable excuse; and
the contrary is not proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt.
The Chief Justice may designate certain types of proceedings (except for excluded proceedings) as the type of proceeding to be conducted through a remote medium (designated type of proceeding).
In making a designation under subsection (1), the Chief Justice may also—
provide that the court may order a different mode of hearing for a proceeding even if it falls within the designated type of proceeding; and
specify the factors that have to be considered by the court before making an order under paragraph (a).
The Chief Justice may, by notice published in the Gazette, amend the Schedules.
The Chief Justice may make rules or give directions regarding any or all of the following—
the designation for the purposes of the definition of remote medium in section 2;
the application for a remote hearing order under section 6;
the application for variation or revocation of a remote hearing order under section 7 or 8;
the procedures and practice to be followed by a court in conducting a remote hearing;
the giving of evidence through a remote medium;
the administration of oaths and affirmations under section 17;
the transmission of documents for the purposes of a remote hearing under section 19;
the presentation of objects for the purposes of a remote hearing under section 20;
the signing of or the writing on documents for the purposes of a remote hearing under section 21;
the broadcast of an open proceeding under section 24;
the designation under section 30;
the better carrying into effect of the provisions and purposes of this Ordinance.
The Judiciary Administrator may issue instructions of an administrative nature relating to any or all of the following—
the technical details and standards of a remote medium;
the hardware, software, equipment and other technical requirements for participating in a remote hearing;
the details of pretesting requirements and contingency measures;
the details for the broadcast of an open proceeding under Part 4;
any other arrangements for facilitating the conduct of a remote hearing.
In this Part—
commencement date (生效日期) means the day on which this Ordinance comes into operation; existing proceeding (現有法律程序) means a proceeding that has not yet been disposed of on the commencement date; subject provision (標的條文) means section 79I of Cap. 221 as in force immediately before the commencement date.In this Part, a reference to a proceeding to be conducted remotely is a reference to a proceeding to be conducted through a live television link or any other facility for remote communication.
For an existing proceeding that is an NS proceeding—
every application made before the commencement date under the subject provision in the proceeding is to be regarded as having been withdrawn;
every application otherwise made before the commencement date for the proceeding to be conducted remotely is to be regarded as having been withdrawn;
as long as a verdict has not yet been delivered in the proceeding, every permission given under the pre-amended subject provision in the proceeding is to be regarded as having never been given; and
as long as a final judgment has not yet been rendered in the proceeding, every order otherwise made before the commencement date for the proceeding to be conducted remotely is to be regarded as having never been made.
In this section—
pre-amended subject provision (修訂前的標的條文) means section 79I of Cap. 221 as in force immediately before 23 March 2024.For an existing proceeding that is not an NS proceeding—
every application made before the commencement date under the subject provision in the proceeding is to be determined as if this Ordinance had not been enacted;
every application otherwise made before the commencement date for the proceeding to be conducted remotely is to be determined as if this Ordinance had not been enacted;
if permission has been given before the commencement date under the subject provision in the proceeding—the old law continues to apply in relation to the taking of evidence from a witness outside Hong Kong; and
every order otherwise made before the commencement date for the proceeding to be conducted remotely continues to have effect until the disposal of the proceeding.
In this section—
old law (舊有法律) means— (a)Part IIIB of Cap. 221 as in force immediately before the commencement date; and (b)the Live Television Link (Witnesses outside Hong Kong) Rules (Cap. 221 sub. leg. L) as in force immediately before the commencement date.The enactments specified in Divisions 2, 3 and 4 are amended as set out in those Divisions.
Section 7—
Repeal the section
Substitute
A person commits an offence if the person, without lawful authority, intentionally records either or both of the following—
any court premises;
any person on court premises.
A person commits an offence if—
the person, without lawful authority, intentionally publishes an unauthorized court recording or a reproduction of an unauthorized court recording; and
the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the recording concerned is an unauthorized court recording.
A person commits an offence if—
the person, without lawful authority, intentionally publishes an authorized court recording or a reproduction of an authorized court recording; and
the person knows that the person has no lawful authority to publish the recording or reproduction (as the case may be), or is reckless as to whether the person has the lawful authority to publish the recording or reproduction (as the case may be).
A person who commits an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine at level 5 and to imprisonment for 1 year.
It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under subsection (1), (2) or (3) to establish that, at the time of the alleged offence, the person had reasonable excuse for the contravention.
For the purposes of subsection (5), a person is taken to have established the reasonable excuse for the contravention if—
there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue that the person had a reasonable excuse; and
the contrary is not proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt.
In this section—
authorized court recording (獲授權法院紀錄) means a court recording made with lawful authority; court (法院) means a court of competent jurisdiction of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and includes a magistrate; court recording (法院紀錄) means a recording of either or both of the following—(a)any court premises;(b)any person on court premises; image (影像) means—(a)a portrait, drawing or sketch;(b)a photograph, video recording or film; or(c)a static or moving visual record; proceeding (法律程序) means a proceeding before a court, and includes part of such a proceeding, regardless of the mode of hearing for the proceeding; publish (發布) includes send, transmit, distribute, circulate, upload, reproduce, make available and disseminate; record (記錄)—(a)means—(i)any act of creating or generating an image; or(ii)any act of creating or generating an audio record; and(b)includes any act of making an audio record, a visual record or an audio-visual record, that is transmitted in real time with or without retention or storage in—(i)a physical form; or(ii)an electronic form from which the record is capable of being reproduced with or without the aid of any device; unauthorized court recording (未經授權法院紀錄) means a court recording made without lawful authority.In this section, a reference to recording any court premises is a reference to recording—
any place in—
a building specified in Part 1 of the Schedule; or
a part of a building specified in Part 2 of the Schedule; or
any other place that is used as a courtroom on the date on which the recording is made,
and a reference to recording any person on court premises, and a reference to a recording of court premises or any person on court premises, are to be construed accordingly.
For the purposes of subsection (8)(b), a place is used as a courtroom on a particular day if a proceeding is being conducted, or scheduled to be conducted, in that place on that day.
The Chief Justice may, by notice published in the Gazette, amend the Schedule.
After section 7—
Add
In a proceeding brought under section 7, a certificate stating that a specified permission is not given by the court to a person, and purporting to be signed by or on behalf of the Judiciary Administrator, is admissible in evidence on its production without further proof.
Unless the contrary is proved, a certificate admitted in evidence under subsection (1)—
is presumed to be signed by or on behalf of the Judiciary Administrator (as the case may be); and
is evidence of the facts stated in the certificate.
In this section—
specified permission (指明批准) means a permission to do an act that would otherwise constitute an offence under section 7.”.At the end of the Ordinance—
Add
Court of Final Appeal Building, 8 Jackson Road, Central, Hong Kong.
High Court Building, 38 Queensway, Admiralty, Hong Kong.
Lands Tribunal Building, 38 Gascoigne Road, Yau Ma Tei, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Labour Tribunal Building, 36 Gascoigne Road, Yau Ma Tei, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Fanling Law Courts Building, 1 Pik Fung Road, Fanling, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Kowloon City Law Courts Building, 147M Argyle Street, Kowloon City, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Kwun Tong Law Courts Building, 10 Lei Yue Mun Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Shatin Law Courts Building, 1 Yi Ching Lane, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Tuen Mun Law Courts Building, 1 Tuen Hi Road, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong.
West Kowloon Law Courts Building, 501 Tung Chau Street, Sham Shui Po, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Tsuen Wan Law Courts Building, 70 Tai Ho Road, Tsuen Wan, New Territories, Hong Kong.
3/F to 10/F, Eastern Law Courts Building, 29 Tai On Street, Sai Wan Ho, Hong Kong.
10/F to 12/F, Revenue Tower, 5 Gloucester Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong.
M1/F to 12/F, 15/F, 16/F, 25/F and 26/F, Wanchai Tower, 12 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong.”.
After section 83R—
Add
The Court of Appeal may direct that an application for leave to appeal be determined with or without a hearing.
Subsection (1) applies to an application for leave to appeal that was made, but has not yet been listed for hearing, before the relevant date as if it were made after that date.
In this section—
relevant date (有關日期) means the day on which the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance (6 of 2025) comes into operation.”.After section 83Y(2)(ba)—
Add
to give a direction under section 83RA;”.
After section 33(2)—
Add
An application under this section may be determined by the Court, with or without a hearing.
Subsection (2A) applies to an application for leave to appeal that was made, but has not yet been listed for hearing, before the relevant date as if it were made after that date.”.
After section 33(3)—
Add
In this section—
relevant date (有關日期) means the day on which the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance (6 of 2025) comes into operation.”.Order 48, rule 3, after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Order 49B, rule 1AA, after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Order 68, rule 8, heading—
Repeal
recording
Substitute
, digital, electronic or optical recording
Order 68, rule 8, after “mechanical”—
Add
“, digital, electronic or optical”.
Section 19, after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Rule 4A(b), after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Section 79(1), after “mechanical”—
Add
“, digital, electronic or optical”.
Rule 2(2)(b), after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Section 34(1), after “mechanical”—
Add
“, digital, electronic or optical”.
Section 81(3)—
Repeal
“or electrical”
Substitute
“, digital, electronic or optical”.
Rule 2(2)(b), after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Order 48, rule 3, after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Order 49B, rule 1AA, after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Order 68, rule 8, heading—
Repeal
recording
Substitute
, digital, electronic or optical recording
Order 68, rule 8, after “mechanical”—
Add
“, digital, electronic or optical”.
Section 15, after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Rule 4A(b), after “mechanical,”—
Add
“digital,”.
Rule 14(1)(b)—
Repeal
“electronic or mechanical”
Substitute
“mechanical, digital, electronic or optical”.
The enactments specified in Divisions 2 to 7 are amended as set out in those Divisions.
Order 70, rule 4(2), (2A) and (3)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Order 70, rule 5(2)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Order 70, rule 6(1)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Order 70, rule 7, heading—
Repeal
live television link
Substitute
live audio-visual link
Order 70, rule 7(1)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Section 74—
live television link
Section 74—
Add in alphabetical order
“live audio-visual link (音視直播聯繫) has the meaning given by section 2 of the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance (6 of 2025);”.Section 76(2)(a)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Section 77(2) and (2A)—
Repeal
“live television link” (wherever appearing)
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Section 77E(2)(a)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Section 77E—
Repeal subsection (6A)
Substitute
In subsection (2)—
live audio-visual link (音視直播聯繫) has the meaning given by section 2 of the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance (6 of 2025).”.Part IIIB—
Repeal the Part.
Section 83V—
Repeal subsections (14) and (16).
The Live Television Link (Witnesses outside Hong Kong) Rules—
Repeal the Rules.
Section 81(4)—
Repeal
Cap. 221
Substitute
6 of 2025
Section 81(4)(a) and (b)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Section 81—
Repeal subsection (5)
Substitute
In subsection (4)—
live audio-visual link (音視直播聯繫) has the meaning given by section 2 of the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance (6 of 2025).”.Section 118(1)(b)—
Repeal
“and (6) to”
Substitute
“, (6) to (13A), (15) and”.
Section 9(1)(aa)—
Repeal
“live television link”
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Section 9—
Repeal subsection (4)
Substitute
In subsection (1)—
live audio-visual link (音視直播聯繫) has the meaning given by section 2 of the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance (6 of 2025).”.Section 10(1)—
Repeal
“live television link” (wherever appearing)
Substitute
“live audio-visual link”.
Section 10—
Repeal subsection (15)
Substitute
In this section—
live audio-visual link (音視直播聯繫) has the meaning given by section 2 of the Courts (Remote Hearing) Ordinance (6 of 2025).”.A criminal trial
A hearing before the Juvenile Court
Court of Final Appeal Building, 8 Jackson Road, Central, Hong Kong.
High Court Building, 38 Queensway, Admiralty, Hong Kong.
Lands Tribunal Building, 38 Gascoigne Road, Yau Ma Tei, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Labour Tribunal Building, 36 Gascoigne Road, Yau Ma Tei, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Fanling Law Courts Building, 1 Pik Fung Road, Fanling, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Kowloon City Law Courts Building, 147M Argyle Street, Kowloon City, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Kwun Tong Law Courts Building, 10 Lei Yue Mun Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Shatin Law Courts Building, 1 Yi Ching Lane, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Tuen Mun Law Courts Building, 1 Tuen Hi Road, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong.
West Kowloon Law Courts Building, 501 Tung Chau Street, Sham Shui Po, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Tsuen Wan Law Courts Building, 70 Tai Ho Road, Tsuen Wan, New Territories, Hong Kong.
3/F to 10/F, Eastern Law Courts Building, 29 Tai On Street, Sai Wan Ho, Hong Kong.
10/F to 12/F, Revenue Tower, 5 Gloucester Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong.
M1/F to 12/F, 15/F, 16/F, 25/F and 26/F, Wanchai Tower, 12 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong.