Court Proceedings (Electronic Technology) (High Court Civil Proceedings) Rules
(Made by the Chief Justice under section 26 of the Court Proceedings (Electronic Technology) Ordinance (Cap. 638))
[30 June 2025]
These Rules come into operation on 30 June 2025.
In these Rules—
administrative instructions (行政指示) means instructions issued under section 33(1) of the Ordinance; CFI (原訟庭), except in rule 4(2), means the Court of First Instance; closure time (暫停辦公時間), in relation to a court office, means—(a)any time on a weekday (other than a Saturday) during which the office is normally closed to the public;(b)any time on a Saturday or general holiday;(c)any time during which the office is closed to the public for—(i)a gale warning as defined by section 2 of the Judicial Proceedings (Adjournment During Gale Warnings) Ordinance (Cap. 62); or(ii)a black rainstorm warning as defined by section 71(2) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 1); or(d)any time during which the office is directed under Order 64, rule 7(1A) or (2) of the RHC to be closed; Court (法院) means the Court of Appeal, the CFI, a judge, a judicial officer or a court office; court office (法院辦事處) means a registry of the High Court or an office of the High Court; direction of the Court (法院指示) means a direction given by the Court of Appeal, the CFI, a judge or a judicial officer; e-practice direction (電子實務指示) has the meaning given by section 9 of the Ordinance; judge (法官) means—(a)the Chief Judge;(b)a Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal;(c)a judge of the CFI;(d)a recorder of the CFI; or(e)a deputy judge of the CFI; judicial officer (司法人員) means—(a)the Registrar of the High Court;(b)a senior deputy registrar of the High Court;(c)a deputy registrar of the High Court;(d)an assistant registrar of the High Court;(e)a temporary registrar of the High Court;(f)a temporary senior deputy registrar of the High Court;(g)a temporary deputy registrar of the High Court; or(h)a temporary assistant registrar of the High Court; Organization User account holder (機構用户帳户持有人), in relation to a registered user, means an individual who, under any administrative instructions, may send (either in the individual’s own name or in the individual’s capacity as an officer in the registered user) a document to the Court by means of an e-system using the same account as the registered user; registered user (註冊用户) means a person who is registered as a user of an e-system under any administrative instructions; RHC (《高院規則》) means the Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4 sub. leg. A); written law (成文法律) has the meaning given by section 9 of the Ordinance.The use of an e-system is authorized for all proceedings to which these Rules apply.
These Rules apply to a proceeding in the Court—
to which the RHC apply; and
for which the use of electronic technology has been implemented under an implementation notice.
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, these Rules cease to apply to a proceeding under subrule (1) if—
the CFI makes an order under Order 4, rule 9(1) of the RHC (consolidation order) in relation to the proceeding; and
these Rules do not apply to any other proceeding in relation to which the consolidation order is made.
In subrule (2)—
CFI (原訟庭) means—(a)the Court of First Instance;(b)any one or more of the judges of the Court of First Instance whether sitting in court or in chambers; or(c)the Registrar as defined by Order 1, rule 4(1) of the RHC.If, in the course of or in connection with a proceeding, because of anything done or left undone, there has been a failure to comply with a requirement of these Rules, the failure—
is to be treated as an irregularity; and
does not nullify—
the proceeding;
a step taken in the proceeding; or
a document, judgment or order in the proceeding.
The Court may, on the ground that there has been a failure mentioned in subrule (1), and on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it considers just—
set aside either wholly or in part the proceeding in which the failure occurred, the step taken in the proceeding or the document, judgment or order in the proceeding; or
exercise its powers under the RHC or its inherent jurisdiction and make such order as it considers appropriate.
An application to set aside for irregularity a proceeding, a step taken in a proceeding or a document, judgment or order in a proceeding must not be allowed unless it is made—
within a reasonable time; and
before the party applying has taken any fresh step after becoming aware of the irregularity.
An application under this rule may be made by summons and the grounds on which the application is made must be stated in the summons.
In this Part—
Registry (登記處) means a registry of the High Court.Only a registered user or an Organization User account holder may send a document to the Court by means of an e-system.
This rule applies to a document sent to the Court by means of an e-system other than a document sent to the Court for issue out of the Court.
When the document is given system confirmation, the document is taken to have been received by the Court at the time it was given initial receipt.
However, if the time at which the document is given initial receipt is a time specified in subrule (4) (specified time), the document is taken to have been received by the Court at whichever is the earlier of the following times—
the time when the Registry is next normally open to the public;
the time when the Registry is next open for the proceeding to which the document relates.
The specified time—
is a closure time of the Registry; and
is not a time during which the Registry is open for the proceeding to which the document relates.
If an e-fee is payable for sending the document to the Court, an initial receipt given for the document before the transaction concerned is completed does not have effect for the purposes of subrules (2) and (3).
In this rule—
e-fee (電子費用) has the meaning given by rule 2 of the Court Proceedings (Electronic Technology) (High Court) (Electronic Fees) Rules; initial receipt (初步收據), in relation to a document sent under this rule, means the acknowledgement by the e-system of the initial receipt of the whole document immediately before system confirmation; system confirmation (系統確認), in relation to a document sent under this rule, means confirmation by the e-system of the acceptance of the document.This rule applies to a document that—
is—
a document by which proceedings are commenced in the Court;
an inter-partes summons; or
any other document that falls within a type or description of documents specified in e-practice directions for the purposes of this rule;
is sent by a registered user or an Organization User account holder to the Court by means of an e-system for issue out of the Court; and
has been issued out of the Court.
The document is taken to have been issued out of the Court at the time it was given initial receipt.
However, if the time at which the document is given initial receipt is a time specified in subrule (4) (specified time), the document is taken to have been issued out of the Court at whichever is the earlier of the following times—
the time when the Registry is next normally open to the public;
the time when the Registry is next open for the proceeding to which the document relates.
The specified time—
is a closure time of the Registry; and
is not a time during which the Registry is open for the proceeding to which the document relates.
In this rule—
initial receipt (初步收據), in relation to a document sent under this rule, means the acknowledgement by the e-system of the initial receipt of the whole document immediately before the issue of the document out of the Court.This rule applies to a document that—
is not a document specified in rule 10(1)(a);
is sent by a registered user or an Organization User account holder to the Court by means of an e-system for issue out of the Court; and
has been issued out of the Court, whether amended by the Court or not.
The document is taken to have been issued out of the Court at the time it was sent by the Court to the registered user or the Organization User account holder (as the case requires) by means of an e-system.
This rule applies if—
a provision of written law or a direction of the Court requires an original, or a verified, certified or authenticated document, to be sent to the Court (requirement); or
a provision of written law or a direction of the Court permits an original, or a verified, certified or authenticated document, to be sent to the Court (permission).
This rule applies in relation to a document sent to the Court whether the provision of written law or direction of the Court—
uses “file”, “lodge”, “send”, “give”, “notify”, “serve”, “deliver”, “submit”, “furnish” (including grammatical variations and cognate expressions) or any other expression that signifies conveying a document; or
otherwise suggests the conveying of a document to the Court.
Despite the requirement, a copy of the original, or the verified, certified or authenticated document, may be sent to the Court in electronic form by means of an e-system if the original, or the verified, certified or authenticated document, is a document specified in subrule (5).
Without limiting the permission, a copy of the original, or the verified, certified or authenticated document, may be sent to the Court in electronic form by means of an e-system if the original, or the verified, certified or authenticated document, is a document specified in subrule (5).
The document is—
a judgment, or a verified, certified or authenticated copy of or a translation of it, referred to in Order 71, rule 3(1)(a) of the RHC;
an original of, or a verified, certified or authenticated copy of, an agreement referred to in Order 71B, rule 2(2)(a) of the RHC;
an entry referred to in Order 90, rule 3(3A)(a) of the RHC;
an order, or a verified, certified or authenticated copy of or a translation of it, referred to in Order 115, rule 15(a) of the RHC;
an order, or a verified, certified or authenticated copy of or a translation of it, referred to in Order 115A, rule 5(a) of the RHC; or
any other document that falls within a type or description of documents specified in e-practice directions for the purposes of this rule.
This rule applies if—
a provision of written law or a direction of the Court requires a document to be conveyed by producing it to the Court as a paper document (requirement); or
a provision of written law or a direction of the Court permits a document to be conveyed by producing it to the Court as a paper document (permission).
This rule applies in relation to a document produced to the Court as a paper document whether the provision of written law or direction of the Court—
uses “file”, “lodge”, “send”, “give”, “notify”, “serve”, “deliver”, “submit”, “furnish” (including grammatical variations and cognate expressions) or any other expression that signifies conveying a document; or
otherwise suggests the conveying of a document to the Court.
Despite the requirement, a copy of the document may be sent to the Court in electronic form by means of an e-system if the document is a document specified in subrule (5).
Without limiting the permission, a copy of the document may be sent to the Court in electronic form by means of an e-system if the document is a document specified in subrule (5).
The document is—
a document specified in the Schedule; or
any other document that falls within a type or description of documents specified in e-practice directions for the purposes of this rule.
Without affecting subrules (3) and (4), in making an order that a document be produced to the Court under the RHC, the Court may instead permit the document to be sent to the Court in electronic form by means of an e-system.
If a document is sent by or to the Court in paper form, the Court may convert the document into electronic form for one or more of the purposes specified in subrule (3).
If a document is sent by or to the Court in electronic form, the Court may convert the document into paper form for one or more of the purposes specified in subrule (3).
The purposes are—
compiling a case file for the proceeding to which the document relates;
transferring the proceeding to which the document relates under Part 8;
providing a copy of the document under Order 63, rule 4 of the RHC;
any other purpose the Court considers appropriate.
In this rule—
send (送交), in relation to a document, means file, lodge, give, notify, serve, deliver, submit, furnish or any other expression that signifies or suggests conveying the document.In this Part—
designated system (指定系統) means the information system (other than an e-system) designated by a receiving person; originating document (原訴文件) means the document by which proceedings are commenced in the Court; receiving person (接收人), in relation to a document, means the person on whom the document is to be served; serving person (送達人), in relation to a document, means the person who is to serve the document.This Part applies if a provision of written law or a direction of the Court requires or permits a document to be served on or by a person by personal service or by post (whether registered or not).
However, this Part does not apply to the service of a document if—
a provision of written law or a direction of the Court specifies in relation to the document personal service or delivery by hand as the only mode of service; or
the document falls within a type or description of documents excluded by e-practice directions from the application of this Part.
This Part applies in relation to a document served on or by a person whether the provision of written law or direction of the Court—
uses “serve”, “send”, “give”, “deliver”, “furnish” (including grammatical variations and cognate expressions) or any other expression that signifies service; or
otherwise suggests the service of a document by a person on another person.
For the purposes of this Part, a document is sent by electronic transmission if it is sent in the form of an electronic record to an information system.
If the condition specified in rule 19(1) is satisfied, a document may be served by a serving person on a receiving person by sending the document to a designated system by electronic transmission.
However, service of a document on a receiving person who is not within the jurisdiction may only be effected under subrule (1) if—
it is effected also in compliance with Order 11 of the RHC; or
it is effected on the solicitor representing the receiving person in the proceeding concerned.
Subrule (1) does not affect the operation of Order 65, rule 4 of the RHC.
For the purposes of the RHC, the designated system to which a document is sent under subrule (1) is taken to be at the address for service of the receiving person of the document.
For the purposes of rule 18(1), the condition is that the receiving person has given a notice—
notifying the serving person that the receiving person consents to accept service of the document by electronic transmission; and
notifying the serving person of the designated system for receiving the document.
The notice may be given in any way the receiving person considers appropriate, except orally.
The consent takes effect at the time when the receiving person gives the notice.
If the notice is given by post (whether registered or not), the notice is taken to have been given on the day of posting the notice.
The receiving person of a document may file and serve on the serving person of the document a notice to withdraw the consent to the acceptance of service by electronic transmission.
The notice must be in the form specified in e-practice directions.
The receiving person of a document may file and serve on the serving person of the document a notice to change the designated system.
The notice must be in the form specified in e-practice directions.
A notice specified in rule 20(1) or 21(1) may be served by a receiving person on a serving person—
in accordance with Order 65, rule 5 of the RHC; or
if the serving person has notified the receiving person that the serving person consents to accept service by electronic transmission—by sending the notice to the information system designated by the serving person by electronic transmission.
If an originating document is served under rule 18, the document is, unless the contrary is shown, taken to have been served on the seventh day following the day on which the document is sent by electronic transmission.
If a document (other than an originating document) is served under rule 18 or 22(b), the document is, unless the contrary is shown, taken to have been served on the business day following the day on which the document is sent by electronic transmission.
In subrule (2)—
business day (工作日) means a day other than a general holiday.This rule applies if—
a serving person is required under a provision of written law or a direction of the Court to file an affidavit proving due service of a document on a receiving person; and
the document is served in accordance with rule 18.
The affidavit proving due service of the document must contain a statement to the effect that in the opinion of the deponent (or, if the deponent is a solicitor of the serving person or an employee of the solicitor, in the opinion of the serving person), the document was sent successfully by electronic transmission.
If the document is an originating document, the affidavit proving its due service must also contain a statement to the effect that in the opinion of the deponent (or, if the deponent is a solicitor of the serving person or an employee of the solicitor, in the opinion of the serving person), the document will have come to the knowledge of the receiving person within 7 days following the day on which the document is sent by electronic transmission.
The affidavit proving due service of the document (whether an originating document or not) must exhibit the record—
evidencing the satisfaction of the condition specified in rule 19(1); and
evidencing the sending of the document by electronic transmission.
This rule applies if—
a writ was purportedly served by a serving person on a receiving person under rule 18; and
judgment has been entered against the receiving person under Order 13 of the RHC.
If, after judgment has been entered by the serving person against the receiving person, the serving person becomes aware that the copy of the writ was not sent successfully, the serving person must, before taking any step in the action or the enforcement of the judgment, either—
make a request for the judgment to be set aside on the ground that the writ has not been duly served; or
apply to the Court for directions.
Order 13, rule 7(4) and (5) of the RHC applies to a writ purportedly served in accordance with rule 18 in proceedings before the Court as if—
a reference in Order 13, rule 7(4) of the RHC to paragraph (3)(a) were a reference to subrule (2)(a);
a reference in Order 13, rule 7(5) of the RHC to paragraph (3)(b) were a reference to subrule (2)(b); and
a reference in Order 13, rule 7(5)(b) of the RHC to the return were a reference to the unsuccessful sending by electronic transmission.
In this rule—
writ (令狀) means a writ of summons.In this Part—
digital signature (數碼簽署) means a digital signature within the meaning of section 2(1) of the ETO that satisfies the requirements specified in rule 34(1); electronic signature (電子簽署) has the meaning given by section 2(1) of the ETO; ETO (《電子交易條例》) means the Electronic Transactions Ordinance (Cap. 553); ordinary electronic signature (一般電子簽署) means an electronic signature that complies with the conditions specified in rule 33; scanned electronic signature (經掃瞄電子簽署) means an electronic signature that complies with the conditions specified in rule 32; signer (簽署人) means a person referred to in rule 28(a).Subrule (2) applies to a document that—
is required or permitted to be signed or certified by a person specified in subrule (3) under a provision of written law or a direction of the Court; and
is in electronic form.
The document must be authenticated—
by the signature of the person in the form of—
a scanned electronic signature;
an ordinary electronic signature; or
a digital signature; or
in any other way specified in e-practice directions.
The person is—
a judge;
a judicial officer; or
a bailiff within the meaning of Order 1, rule 4(1) of the RHC.
Subrule (5) applies to a document that—
is required or permitted to be sealed by the Court under a provision of written law or a direction of the Court; and
is in electronic form.
The document must be sealed in a way specified in e-practice directions.
This Division applies to a document that—
is required or permitted to be signed by a person under a provision of written law or a direction of the Court; and
is sent to the Court by means of an e-system.
This rule applies if the document is—
an affidavit (except an affidavit proving due service of a document);
a statutory declaration;
a deposition under Order 39, rule 11 of the RHC; or
a notarial instrument within the meaning of section 35A(2) of the Evidence Ordinance (Cap. 8).
The document must be authenticated—
by the signature of the signer in the form of a scanned electronic signature; or
in any other way specified in e-practice directions.
A document that is not a document specified in rule 29(1) must be authenticated—
by the signature of the signer in the form of—
a scanned electronic signature;
an ordinary electronic signature; or
a digital signature; or
in any other way specified in e-practice directions.
Without limiting subrule (1), if the signer of the document is the submitter of the document, the document may be authenticated—
if the submitter is a registered user—by inputting the signer’s name at a place where the signature of the signer would otherwise appear on the document; and
if the submitter is an Organization User account holder—by inputting the signer’s name and, if applicable, the post title with the registered user concerned, at a place where the signature of the signer would otherwise appear on the document.
In subrule (2)—
submitter (呈交人), in relation to a document, means a registered user or an Organization User account holder, who sends the document to the Court by means of an e-system.This rule applies to a document that—
is served in electronic form by a serving person on a receiving person;
is required or permitted to be signed by the serving person under a provision of written law or a direction of the Court; and
is not sent to the Court.
The document may be authenticated—
by the signature of the serving person in the form of—
a scanned electronic signature;
an ordinary electronic signature; or
a digital signature; or
in any other way agreed by the serving person and receiving person.
In this rule—
receiving person (接收人), in relation to a document, means the person on whom the document is to be served; serving person (送達人), in relation to a document, means the person who is to serve the document.The conditions specified for the purposes of the definition of scanned electronic signature are that—
the signer manually signs the original paper document; and
a true and complete electronic image of the original paper document containing the signature of the signer is created in the form of an electronic record.
The conditions specified for the purposes of the definition of ordinary electronic signature are that—
the document is in the form of an electronic record;
the signer uses a method to attach the electronic signature to the electronic record or to logically associate that signature with the electronic record for the purposes of—
identifying the signer as the person who signed the document; and
indicating that the information contained in the document is authenticated or approved by the signer; and
having regard to all the relevant circumstances, the method is reliable, and is appropriate, for the purpose for which the information contained in the document is communicated.
The requirements specified for the purposes of the definition of digital signature are that—
the digital signature is supported by a recognized certificate;
the digital signature is generated within the validity of the certificate; and
the digital signature is used in accordance with the terms of that certificate.
In this rule—
certification authority (核證機關) has the meaning given by section 2(1) of the ETO; recognized certificate (認可證書) has the meaning given by section 2(1) of the ETO; recognized certification authority (認可核證機關) has the meaning given by section 2(1) of the ETO; within the validity of the certificate (在該證書的有效期內) means that at the time the digital signature is generated—(a)the certificate that supports it has not been revoked or suspended by the certification authority that issued the certificate;(b)the recognition of the certificate has not been revoked or suspended by the Commissioner for Digital Policy;(c)if it is a certificate designated as a recognized certificate issued by the recognized certification authority referred to in section 34 of the ETO—the designation has not been withdrawn by the certification authority;(d)if the Commissioner for Digital Policy has specified a period of validity for the recognition of the certificate—the certificate is within that period; and(e)if the recognized certification authority has specified a period of validity for the certificate—the certificate is within that period.In this Part—
court (某法院) means a court as defined by section 2 of the Ordinance; non-e-Court (非電子法院) means a court that is not an e-Court; Registrar (司法常務官) has the meaning given by Order 1, rule 4(1) of the RHC; transfer document (移交文件), in relation to a proceeding in a court, means—(a)a document issued out of, or sent to, the court in the proceeding;(b)a note of the proceeding of the court; or(c)a transcript or record of the proceeding.This rule applies if an order is made by the Court for the transfer of a proceeding from the Court to a non-e-Court.
The Registrar must, as soon as practicable after the order is made, send to the non-e-Court all transfer documents in relation to the proceeding.
If a transfer document in relation to the proceeding is in electronic form, the Registrar may convert the document into paper form before sending it to the non-e-Court.
This rule applies if an order is made by a court for the transfer of a proceeding from a non-e-Court to the Court.
On receiving a transfer document in relation to the proceeding from the non-e-Court, the Registrar may—
convert the document into electronic form; and
file the document in an electronic case file to be maintained by the Court for the proceeding transferred.
Subrule (2) applies if—
an order is made by the Court directing that a proceeding (relevant proceeding) that was entered in a particular list of the Court (existing list) be transferred to another list of the Court (new list);
a proceeding in the existing list is a proceeding for which the use of an e-system has not been implemented under an implementation notice; and
a proceeding in the new list is a proceeding for which the use of an e-system has been implemented under an implementation notice.
The Registrar may—
convert into electronic form all transfer documents in relation to the relevant proceeding in the existing list; and
file the documents in an electronic case file to be maintained for the relevant proceeding in the new list.
Subrule (4) applies if—
an order is made by the Court directing that a proceeding (relevant proceeding) that was entered in a particular list of the Court (existing list) be transferred to another list of the Court (new list);
a proceeding in the existing list is a proceeding for which the use of an e-system has been implemented under an implementation notice; and
a proceeding in the new list is a proceeding for which the use of an e-system has not been implemented under an implementation notice.
The Registrar may—
convert into paper form all transfer documents in relation to the relevant proceeding in the existing list; and
file the documents and make an entry of the filing of the documents in the cause book.
In subrule (4)—
cause book (訟案登記冊) has the meaning given by Order 1, rule 4(1) of the RHC.This rule applies to a payment that is made by means of an e-system for a purpose specified in the administrative instructions for the purposes of this rule.
The payment is taken to have been received by the Court at the time when the payment transaction is completed (completion time).
However, if the completion time is a time specified in subrule (4) (specified time), the payment is taken to have been received by the Court at whichever is the earlier of the following times—
the time when the accounts office of the High Court is next normally open to the public;
the time when the accounts office is next open for the proceeding to which the payment relates.
The specified time—
is a closure time of the accounts office of the High Court; and
is not a time during which the accounts office is open for the proceeding to which the payment relates.
A receipt for payment referred to in Order 11, rule 8 of the RHC
A receipt for payment referred to in Order 11, rule 8A of the RHC
A certificate by a plaintiff’s solicitor referred to in Order 13, rule 4(1) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 13, rule 4(1) of the RHC
A writ indorsed by a defendant’s solicitor referred to in Order 13, rule 7(1) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 13, rule 7(4) of the RHC
A certificate by a plaintiff’s solicitor referred to in Order 19, rule 5(1) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 19, rule 5(1) of the RHC
A consent to an action being withdrawn referred to in Order 21, rule 2(4) of the RHC
A copy certified as a true copy of a record of proceedings referred to in Order 25, rule 8(1)(dd) of the RHC
A note authorizing the issue of a writ referred to in Order 32, rule 7(1) of the RHC
A copy certified as a true copy of a record of proceedings referred to in Order 37, rule 1(1A)(f) of the RHC
A certificate, order or other document referred to in Order 42, rule 5(3) of the RHC
An order referred to in Order 42, rule 5(6) of the RHC
A draft writ referred to in Order 44A, rule 1(2)(a) of the RHC
A judgment or order, or an office copy of it, referred to in Order 46, rule 6(4)(a)(i) of the RHC
An order or evidence referred to in Order 46, rule 6(4)(a)(ii) of the RHC
A bailiff’s list referred to in Order 47, rule 6(6) of the RHC
A receipt for fees referred to in paragraph 2(1)(b) of Part II of the First Schedule to Order 62 of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 70, rule 2(1) of the RHC
An affidavit or order referred to in Order 71, rule 10(3) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3) of the RHC
An agreement, or a copy of it, referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(i) of the RHC
An agreement, award, order or direction, or a copy of it, referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(ii) of the RHC
An agreement or instrument, or a copy of it, referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(iiaa) of the RHC
An agreement, order or direction, or a copy of it, referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(iia) of the RHC
A document referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(iii) of the RHC
A document referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(iv) of the RHC
A document referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(v) of the RHC
A document referred to in Order 73, rule 10(3)(a)(vi) of the RHC
A notice referred to in Order 90, rule 3(5)(a) of the RHC
A notice referred to in Order 90, rule 3(6) of the RHC
An originating summons referred to in Order 115, rule 2A(2) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 115, rule 3(2) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 115, rule 5(2) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 115, rule 6(2) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 115, rule 15 of the RHC
A statement or document referred to in Order 115, rule 22(1) of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 115A, rule 5 of the RHC
An originating summons referred to in Order 117, rule 3A of the RHC
An affidavit referred to in Order 117, rule 13(2) of the RHC
A statement or document referred to in Order 117, rule 14(1) of the RHC