Arbitration (Outcome Related Fee Structures for Arbitration) Rules
(Enacting provision omitted—E.R. 1 of 2023)
[16 December 2022]
(Omitted as spent—E.R. 1 of 2023)
In these Rules—
benchmark fee (基準收費), in relation to a matter, means the fee, which may or may not be expressed as an hourly rate, that the lawyer would have charged the client for the matter if no ORFS agreement had been made for the matter.The words and expressions used in these Rules and defined in Part 10B of the Ordinance have the same meaning as in that Part.
For the purposes of section 98ZK(1)(a) of the Ordinance, the general conditions for an ORFS agreement are that—
the agreement—
is in writing; and
is signed by the lawyer and the client; and
the agreement—
states the matter to which the agreement relates, that is the arbitration or any part of it;
states in what circumstances the lawyer’s fees and expenses, or any part of them, are payable;
states that the lawyer has informed the client of the right to seek independent legal advice before entering into the agreement;
states that during a period of not less than 7 days after the date of the making of the agreement, the client may terminate the agreement by written notice without incurring liability;
states whether disbursements, including barristers’ fees, are to be paid by the client irrespective of the outcome of the matter;
states the grounds on which the agreement may be terminated before the conclusion of the matter; and
states the alternative basis, which may or may not be expressed as an hourly rate, on which the lawyer is to be paid by the client in the event of a termination under subparagraph (vi).
For the purposes of section 98ZK(1)(b) of the Ordinance, the specific conditions for a conditional fee agreement are that—
the success fee payable by the client to the lawyer in the event of a successful outcome is expressed as a percentage of the benchmark fee;
the uplift element does not exceed 100% of the benchmark fee; and
the agreement—
states the circumstances that constitute a successful outcome of the matter to which the agreement relates;
states the basis for calculating the success fee; and
states when the success fee becomes payable by the client to the lawyer.
In subrule (1)—
uplift element (提升元素) means the portion of the total fee payable by the client to the lawyer in the event of a successful outcome that exceeds the benchmark fee for the matter to which the agreement relates.For the purposes of section 98ZK(1)(b) of the Ordinance, the specific conditions for a damages-based agreement or hybrid damages-based agreement are that—
the DBA payment within the meaning of section 98ZD(a) of the Ordinance—
is calculated by reference to the financial benefit that is obtained by the client in the matter to which the agreement relates;
does not exceed 50% of the financial benefit that is obtained by the client in the matter; and
is payable in addition to any recoverable lawyer’s costs; and
the agreement—
states the financial benefit to which the agreement relates;
states the basis for calculating the DBA payment;
states when the DBA payment becomes payable by the client to the lawyer; and
states whether—
barrister’s fees are to be regarded as part of the DBA payment; or
the client is liable to pay barrister’s fees in addition to the DBA payment.
For the purposes of section 98ZK(1)(b) of the Ordinance, the additional specific conditions for a hybrid damages-based agreement are that the agreement—
states the fee referred to in section 98ZE(b) of the Ordinance;
states the benchmark fee;
provides that in the event that no financial benefit is obtained by the client in the matter to which the agreement relates, the client is not required to pay to the lawyer more than 50% of the irrecoverable costs; and
provides that in the event that the client obtains a financial benefit in the matter but the DBA payment is less than the capped amount—
the lawyer may elect to retain the capped amount instead of the DBA payment; and
if the lawyer so elects—the capped amount instead of the DBA payment is to be payable by the client to the lawyer.
In this rule—
capped amount (上限款額), in relation to a matter to which a hybrid damages-based agreement relates, means the amount of the irrecoverable costs that would have been payable to the lawyer by the client under the agreement in the event described in subrule (1)(c); irrecoverable costs (不可追討的訟費), in relation to a matter to which a hybrid damages-based agreement relates, means any portion of the benchmark fee that is not recoverable from any other party to the arbitration.If—
in relation to a client, 2 or more specified agreements subsist at any given time; and
the DBA payments under those specified agreements are calculated by reference to the same financial benefit,
the aggregate sum of the DBA payments to be paid by the client under those specified agreements must not exceed 50% of the financial benefit.
Subrule (1) applies regardless of the terms and conditions under the specified agreements.
In this rule—
specified agreement (指明協議) means a damages-based agreement or hybrid damages-based agreement.Before a lawyer enters into an ORFS agreement with a client, the lawyer must ensure that—
the client is provided with all of the information specified in subrule (2) in clear and accessible language; and
the client signs and dates an acknowledgment that the client has received and understood the information mentioned in paragraph (a).
The information is—
the nature and operation of the ORFS agreement, including the general conditions under Part 2, and the specific conditions under Part 3, that are applicable to the agreement;
if the ORFS agreement is a damages-based agreement or hybrid damages-based agreement—the requirements under rule 7;
a statement to the effect that the client has a right to seek independent legal advice before entering into the agreement; and
a statement to the effect that the client—
might not recover the costs specified in section 98ZU(3) of the Ordinance from other parties to the arbitration; and
might be ordered by the arbitral tribunal to pay the costs of another party to the arbitration as described in section 98ZU(4) of the Ordinance.
Before the conclusion of the matter to which an ORFS agreement relates, any party to the agreement may terminate the agreement if the party reasonably believes that—
the other party to the agreement has committed a material breach of the agreement; or
that other party has behaved, or is behaving, unreasonably.
Subrule (1) applies subject to the terms and conditions of the ORFS agreement.