A A
B HCA 2613/2006 B
C IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE C
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
D D
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
E ACTION NO 2613 OF 2006 E
____________
F F
BETWEEN
G G
YIM TIN FOOK 1st Plaintiff
H YIM TIN YAU 2nd Plaintiff H
I and I
YU CHOR LAI, KONG WAI HUNG and
J J
SOU KA LUN trading as WANG CHEUNG
INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS CO. 1st Defendant
K K
TO CHEONG LAM 2nd Defendant
L ____________ L
(By Original Action)
M M
AND BETWEEN
N N
TO CHEONG LAM Plaintiff
O O
and
P P
YIM TIN FOOK 1st Defendant
YIM TIN YAU 2nd Defendant
Q Q
rd
CHAN HI 3 Defendant
R YEUNG HONG SANG 4th Defendant R
CHAN WAI KIN and
S PO YUEN KWAN SHIRLEY 5th Defendant S
LEUNG KWAN POK KEN 6th Defendant
T T
W.S. REALTY COMPANY LIMITED 7th Defendant
U U
V V
-2-
A A
B TO SHUI KI 8th Defendant B
WU CHUN WAI 9th Defendant
C C
____________
D (By Counterclaim) D
E E
Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers
F Date of Hearing: 2 June 2015 F
Date of Decision: 10 June 2015
G G
Date of Corrigenda: 30 June 2015
H __________________ H
CORRIGENDA
I I
__________________
J J
1. Kindly note the following corrections are made in
K K
paragraphs 3, 21 and 23 of the decision handed down on 10 June 2015:-
L L
2. Under paragraph 3, the reference to “the plaintiff’ should be
M M
replaced by “D2/P”.
N N
3. Under paragraph 21, the Ordinance concerned should be the
O O
Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Cap 219 instead of the Land
P Registration Ordinance, Cap 128. P
Q Q
4. Under paragraph 23, “the interest of D8” in line 3 should
R read “the interest of D2/P”. R
S S
T (HUNG Fong-ping) T
Clerk to the Hon Au-Yeung J
U U
V V
YIM TIN FOOK AND ANOTHER v. YU CHOR LAI AND OTHERS
A A
B HCA 2613/2006 B
C IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE C
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
D D
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
E ACTION NO 2613 OF 2006 E
____________
F F
BETWEEN
G G
YIM TIN FOOK 1st Plaintiff
H YIM TIN YAU 2nd Plaintiff H
I and I
YU CHOR LAI, KONG WAI HUNG and
J J
SOU KA LUN trading as WANG CHEUNG
INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS CO. 1st Defendant
K K
TO CHEONG LAM 2nd Defendant
L ____________ L
(By Original Action)
M M
AND BETWEEN
N N
TO CHEONG LAM Plaintiff
O O
and
P P
YIM TIN FOOK 1st Defendant
YIM TIN YAU 2nd Defendant
Q Q
rd
CHAN HI 3 Defendant
R YEUNG HONG SANG 4th Defendant R
CHAN WAI KIN and
S PO YUEN KWAN SHIRLEY 5th Defendant S
LEUNG KWAN POK KEN 6th Defendant
T T
W.S. REALTY COMPANY LIMITED 7th Defendant
U U
V V
-2-
A A
B TO SHUI KI 8th Defendant B
WU CHUN WAI 9th Defendant
C C
____________
D (By Counterclaim) D
E E
Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers
F Date of Hearing: 2 June 2015 F
Date of Decision: 10 June 2015
G G
Date of Corrigenda: 30 June 2015
H __________________ H
CORRIGENDA
I I
__________________
J J
1. Kindly note the following corrections are made in
K K
paragraphs 3, 21 and 23 of the decision handed down on 10 June 2015:-
L L
2. Under paragraph 3, the reference to “the plaintiff’ should be
M M
replaced by “D2/P”.
N N
3. Under paragraph 21, the Ordinance concerned should be the
O O
Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Cap 219 instead of the Land
P Registration Ordinance, Cap 128. P
Q Q
4. Under paragraph 23, “the interest of D8” in line 3 should
R read “the interest of D2/P”. R
S S
T (HUNG Fong-ping) T
Clerk to the Hon Au-Yeung J
U U
V V
HCA2613/2006 YIM TIN FOOK AND ANOTHER v. YU CHOR LAI AND OTHERS - LawHero